That were here today
Latest News
Powered by Blogger.
Popular Posts
-
What are the warning signs of a cheating spouse? Use the form below to see the types of behaviors that are often associated with cheating...
-
What are the possible advantages of not always being completely candid and truthful? Are there some reasons for lying, some of which may...
-
I was first introduced to Second Life by a man who wanted help getting his ex wife back. He told me from the moment they met they both ins...
-
All relationships go through stages and the initial feelings of lust and intense physical desire eventually transition to deeper feelings of...
-
Oct. 2, 2013 — New research by Albright College associate professor of psychology Susan Hughes, Ph.D., has found that men and women alter ...
-
There's no script for attraction. As the Grateful Dead say, one man gathers what another man spills. But some things can be agreed upon,...
-
There is no such thing as a pickup line that will get you the girl. You’re not Harry Potter and your pickup line is not a magic spell. T...
-
While it has been noted that women cannot digest emotional infidelity and men fail to accept sexual infidelity, new research has suggested...
-
A client who had played mind games with her boyfriend was talking about how much she regrets what she had done and how she wishes she coul...
-
How can I deal with my jealousy? While everyone gets jealous or suspicious from time to time, experiencing jealousy on a daily basis can ...
About Us
- The Contemporary Man/ T. Miller
- At The Contemporary Man's, we guarantee that you will succeed with women and get the results you want from your dating life when you use our proven system for success with women called 'Dating Power'. You simply cannot fail when you use our tested techniques for success with women. We have spent the last 5 years testing and refining our method for success with women by: Approaching, dating and being in relationships with modern women ourselves. Coaching over 650 guys in person and literally showing them how to approach and pick up women using our natural style. Testing our techniques in all sorts of social environments, including parties, workplaces, nightclubs, cafes, shopping malls and bookstores to name a few. Interviewing women from around the world and asking for their opinions on the modern dating and relationship scene. Researching all available studies, published documentation and theories in this field. Following up with guys that we'd coached to find out if they needed more advice as they become more successful with women. We then included the advanced advice in our products.
Thursday, August 7, 2014
How Your Facebook Friends Affect Your Relationship
Facebook data is a goldmine of revelations into the structure and functioning of our social lives. The latest Facebook-related discovery offers potential answers to two great relationship questions: Should you date within your friend group? And can you tell if your relationship is destined to fail?
A study published recently has introduced an algorithm that can predict an individual’s significant other based on the mutual friends they share on Facebook. The algorithm measures “dispersion,” the extent to which two people’s mutual friends are connected to one another.
In a study of 1.3 million people, using dispersion to predict an individual’s partner performed best on the networks of married U.S. males, accurately predicting their spouse 76.9% of the time.
Interestingly, the study, a collaborative effort between Jon Kleinberg, a computer scientist at Cornell University, and Lars Backstrom, a senior engineer at Facebook, came to the conclusion that couples with mutual friends who were widely dispersed over an array of social settings were more likely to stay together than those with mutual friends in just one social setting. The study refers to the former structure of mutual friends as “dispersed” and the latter as “embedded.”
Here is an example of dispersion: Let’s say you're a lawyer who plays softball and is involved in theatre. Your partner may know a colleague from your work, a player from your softball team, and one of the actors from your theatre company, but your friends likely do not know each other. Those shared friends would be an example of highly dispersed mutual friends. Whereas, if you and your partner happen to be co-workers and share friends within the office who all know one another, those friends would be embedded mutual friends. The second type of scenario is the type of relationship the study found tends to fail more often.
The research found that, over a 60-day period, couples who had declared that they were “in a relationship” on Facebook were more likely to break up if the structure of their mutual friends exhibited “embeddedness” rather than “dispersion.”
At first glance, this study seems to support the “don’t date within your friend group” doctrine. However, embeddedness and dispersion are not mutually exclusive. Using the example mentioned earlier, it’s possible that you and your partner are co-workers and share many “embedded” mutual friends in one network, but also share “highly dispersed” mutual friends elsewhere. The findings do not condemn dating within a friend group, but rather support maintaining a varied social background while in a relationship. It's a modern framing of the classic directive: “Keep your independence.”
Not only is maintaining a varied social background likely to make you a more independent and well-rounded person, it also enriches your partner’s social life by offering them a bridge to an assortment of diverse social networks. They, in turn, become a bridge themselves between those social worlds. The key here is to mix 'n' match.
It’s when the relationship is rooted in one indistinguishable blob of mutual friends that it is 50% more likely to fail, the study says.
So: Date your friends, date your co-workers and date your entire softball team! But make sure that if things go sour, you have plenty of other social safe havens to run to.
A study published recently has introduced an algorithm that can predict an individual’s significant other based on the mutual friends they share on Facebook. The algorithm measures “dispersion,” the extent to which two people’s mutual friends are connected to one another.
In a study of 1.3 million people, using dispersion to predict an individual’s partner performed best on the networks of married U.S. males, accurately predicting their spouse 76.9% of the time.
Interestingly, the study, a collaborative effort between Jon Kleinberg, a computer scientist at Cornell University, and Lars Backstrom, a senior engineer at Facebook, came to the conclusion that couples with mutual friends who were widely dispersed over an array of social settings were more likely to stay together than those with mutual friends in just one social setting. The study refers to the former structure of mutual friends as “dispersed” and the latter as “embedded.”
Here is an example of dispersion: Let’s say you're a lawyer who plays softball and is involved in theatre. Your partner may know a colleague from your work, a player from your softball team, and one of the actors from your theatre company, but your friends likely do not know each other. Those shared friends would be an example of highly dispersed mutual friends. Whereas, if you and your partner happen to be co-workers and share friends within the office who all know one another, those friends would be embedded mutual friends. The second type of scenario is the type of relationship the study found tends to fail more often.
The research found that, over a 60-day period, couples who had declared that they were “in a relationship” on Facebook were more likely to break up if the structure of their mutual friends exhibited “embeddedness” rather than “dispersion.”
At first glance, this study seems to support the “don’t date within your friend group” doctrine. However, embeddedness and dispersion are not mutually exclusive. Using the example mentioned earlier, it’s possible that you and your partner are co-workers and share many “embedded” mutual friends in one network, but also share “highly dispersed” mutual friends elsewhere. The findings do not condemn dating within a friend group, but rather support maintaining a varied social background while in a relationship. It's a modern framing of the classic directive: “Keep your independence.”
Not only is maintaining a varied social background likely to make you a more independent and well-rounded person, it also enriches your partner’s social life by offering them a bridge to an assortment of diverse social networks. They, in turn, become a bridge themselves between those social worlds. The key here is to mix 'n' match.
It’s when the relationship is rooted in one indistinguishable blob of mutual friends that it is 50% more likely to fail, the study says.
So: Date your friends, date your co-workers and date your entire softball team! But make sure that if things go sour, you have plenty of other social safe havens to run to.
Labels:Adivce
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
Search
Categories
- A Man's Summerize Guide 2013 (6)
- Adivce (234)
- Advice (13)
- Ask T (12)
- Attracting Back Your Ex (6)
- Confidence (5)
- Contemporary Wisdom (10)
- Dating (44)
- Deception (17)
- Female Psychology (1)
- Flirting (1)
- In General (1)
- Jealousy’ (18)
- Mind Games (13)
- Moving on (7)
- On-and-Off Relationships’ (1)
- Online Dating (1)
- Quotes (1)
- Readers' Questions & Answers (34)
- Red Flags (6)
- Sex Tips. (57)
- Texting Women (1)
- The Contemporary Man (6)
- THE PICK UP: PICK UP LINES THAT WORK (4)
- The Real Reasons She's Still Single (2)
- Update (1)
- Work & Office Romance (2)
0 comments: